It was difficult for me to take a firm stance on Wikileaks. At first I believed that some good may come of Assange's website. Government documents accessible by the general public is a freedom of the press. Americans have a right to know what goes on behind the "government curtain." Many people believe that government is corrupt, and knowing more about what government is really about may loosen them up. This is where my support ends.
It's a question of whether Wikileaks is beneficial. I personally don't think the leak of these documents will help anyone. They were created for government. Really, they are only on the internet for our entertainment. A vast majority of the people who check Wikileaks will do nothing about the topics discussed. If anything, the articles/video/strategies posted pose a threat. If military strategies are leaked online, anyone can access them. Therefore a country we may be at war with currently, or in the future can get ahold of our strategies and use them against us.
In my opinion one of the purposes of government is to protect its people from the information found on Wikileaks. Their job is to protect the citizens of this country. This is the reason these documents were deemed private in the first place. If the wrong group of people get ahold of this information, political uproars may begin. As it is people are passionate about politics, and when you add in powerful information like that found on Wikileaks, entire movements may begin. Some may argue that if regular citizens are informed about these issues, we can do something about them. If government thought it fit for us to get involved, the news would have already been released. An argument Julina Assange had about his website was that "these leaks change the world." He of all people should know that the world can change in both beneficial and harmful ways. In his TED interview he mentioned that he receives complaints about the content being to explicit. His argument to the complaints is that the people involved in these events are effected greatly, why can't others at least know, in general, what occurred. As I stated before, it may not be beneficial for others to know. I compare these events to a loss in the family. You are the one who spreads the news to people other than your family. If someone finds out and tells others before you do, you wonder who they thought it was their information to share in the first place. Others may come to support you, but you need support from your own family before outsiders try and intervene.
Danielle!
ReplyDeleteI completely agreee with your position. I really liked how you pointed out that most people will do nothing by learning this information. I personally wouldn't do anything mainly because I wouldn't know where to start. This made my think that maybe he just created this site because people like to know everything about everybody and this is one way to know the important stuff about our country. I think this just creates more tension between peopl because, like you said, people have very strong opinions on politics. Overall, I support your decision to not support Wikileaks.
I agree with your assesment of Jilian Assange's Wikileaks site. Like you said in your post, it is the governments job to protect its people. Anything that is leaked in association to the governments security may endanger the lives of the people it's trying to protects. When you say that some of the leaks posted "can change the world" i wonder is it in his power to do such things?
ReplyDeleteDanielle, I completely agree with you and I think that the example you gave of a family losing a family member is great. The government would have released and shared the information if they wanted us to know or thought it would be beneficial for us to know. I think that people need to realize that the government is there to protect us and if they hide something from us it is in our best interest. I do not think that WikiLeaks is okay in any way and I believe that it should be taken down. There is no reason to put our country or any country in danger because someone decides that knowing all the secrets will “change things”.
ReplyDelete